|
| |
|
InnoVisions
Canada
Toronto Star - Feb 3, 2005
For
our other media reports,
return to our media page |
|
Ottawa not up to `One Tonne
Challenge'
See article on TO Star's site
BOB FORTIER
It's a bit rich of Ottawa to ask individual Canadians to get up for
the "One Tonne Challenge" and reduce harmful pollutants that lead to
climate change. That's because our federal government is an
international laggard when it comes to perhaps the cheapest and
easiest way to get cars off the road and dramatically cut emissions.
It's called telework, or telecommuting, and it entails working from a
remote location instead of commuting to distant offices.
Telework is unequivocally great for the environment. The more cars off
the road, the more reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
Take this one example: The average commuter from Barrie to Toronto
spews some 14 tonnes of greenhouse gases out of his or her vehicle
every year. And there are more than 30,000 of these commuters heading
up and down Highway 400 every day. What if half of those people
stopped commuting and started teleworking full-time?
More than 210,000 tonnes of GHG emissions would be eliminated every
year.
Those savings would be the equivalent of 210,000 people meeting the
"one tonne challenge" — a population the size of Markham.
That's one example: There are hundreds of thousands of commuters who
could park their cars and telework right now. Even part-time, the
impact on reducing emissions would be enormous. It makes one wonder
why Ottawa isn't doing more to promote telework.
It's laughable how far behind our federal government is to those in
every other industrial nation, especially the U.S., Japan and in
Europe.
Sadly, Ottawa's tardiness is two-pronged: Almost nothing is being done
to get Canada's 240,000 federal civil servants teleworking and Ottawa
is ignoring its power of legislation and incentives to foster telework
across the country.
Thankfully, there are leaders in the private sector promoting the
concept and seeing the many benefits, from environmental to real
estate cost reduction to worker satisfaction and effectiveness. Bell
Canada, Sun Microsystems, IBM Canada, Nortel Networks and Royal Bank
all come to mind. There are others, too.
There's even a new company called SuiteWorks that is building telework
complexes where companies and governments can share resources so
employees can work in professional and technologically-advanced
offices near their homes.
For 15 years, Ottawa has talked a good game about telework, but has
done nothing. As a former public servant, I wrote the first, now dusty
plan for a federal civil service telework program.
What makes this inaction even more confounding is that others are
proving the benefits. It's not like Ottawa has to blaze a trail.
Last month, for example, Japan launched a program to ensure 20 per
cent of the nation's workforce is telecommuting by 2010.
In December, President George W. Bush signed a bill that withholds $5
million from every federal agency not making telework available to all
eligible employees.
Today, 13 per cent of eligible U.S. federal workers are teleworking —
more than 100,000 out of 750,000. In Canada, a few in the federal
public service are teleworking, but the numbers aren't known. There is
a policy, but its application is minimal and inconsistent.
There is no tracking of results. No leadership. No idea of the
emission savings potential of telework.
Telework will not solve all our climate change problems, but it can
help. There is great opportunity here and it would require little
effort.
As comedian Rick Mercer might say: "C'mon, Mr. Prime Minister, get up
for the challenge and show some leadership to help the environment."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Fortier is president of the Canadian Telework Association. |
|
|
|